A system of two or more objects has potential energy only when those objects interact exclusively through conservative forces — directly building on Lesson 3.2's distinction. Like kinetic energy, potential energy is a scalar, but instead of depending on motion, it depends on position — specifically, the configuration of the objects within the system.
Formally, potential energy connects to conservative force through an integral — the mirror image of the work integral from Lesson 3.2:
Run the integral relationship backward, and something elegant falls out: in one dimension, the conservative force on a system is simply the negative slope of its potential energy function.
Explore this directly below with a potential energy curve shaped like two valleys separated by a hill.
A potential energy curve with two valleys and a hill between them. Drag through x — the tangent line shows the local slope, and F = −dU/dx follows directly from it.
The force points toward decreasing potential energy — downhill on this graph, exactly like a ball rolling on a real hill.
The force-from-slope relationship turns any U(x) graph into a complete map of a system's equilibrium points.
A small displacement produces a force pushing back toward equilibrium. Occurs at a local minimum of U(x).
A small displacement produces a force pushing further away from equilibrium. Occurs at a local maximum of U(x).
Revisit the tool above — as you scan across the curve, watch how the equilibrium classification switches between the two valleys (stable) and the hill between them (unstable).
A system's potential energy is given by U(x) = x⁴ − 8x² (in joules, x in meters). Find all equilibrium positions and classify each as stable or unstable.
For an ideal spring, stretched or compressed a distance Δx from its equilibrium length:
For two roughly spherical masses (planets, moons, stars):
Near a planet's surface, where the gravitational field is nearly constant, the general form simplifies to the familiar linear approximation:
Compare the two gravitational forms directly below — and see exactly how far you can climb before the approximation starts to break down.
A 70 kg object rising above Earth's surface. Compare the exact gravitational potential energy change to the near-surface linear approximation — and see exactly where they start to diverge.
Near the surface, the two curves sit almost exactly on top of each other — the approximation is excellent. Push the height out toward hundreds of kilometers and the curves visibly begin to separate, since g itself isn't really constant that far up.
For a system with more than two objects, total potential energy is just the sum of the potential energy of every individual pair of objects within that system.
Three point masses (2 kg, 3 kg, 4 kg) sit at the corners of an equilateral triangle with 2 m sides. Find the total gravitational potential energy of the system.