People who build feeds make choices, and they sometimes change them when someone asks clearly. A good request names one specific change, shows what you saw, is fair to the company, and says how anyone could tell it happened. You will audit the feed and settings of one platform you really use, choose one change to ask for, and write a short letter. Your teacher reads it before anything is sent.
You already know how data is collected and guessed (3.1.1, 3.1.2) and how to read a privacy label. These tools cover the new parts: counting a feed fairly, writing an ask, and writing to a company. Open each one when you reach that step.
A good ask is one change to one feature that someone could check. Compare:
| Too vague | Concrete | Why the second works |
|---|---|---|
| Stop tracking us. | Make location data used for advertising opt-in instead of on by default. | Names the data and the change. Easy to check in settings. |
| Make the feed better. | Add a "Show me something different" option that mixes in topics I haven't viewed recently. | Names a feature. A person could test it. |
| Do more to protect teens. | Show users under 18 a plain-language summary of what their account collects the first time they open settings. | Says who, what and when. |
| Label your ads. | Put the word "Ad" in the same place and size on every sponsored item in the feed. | Says what "labeled" means. |
The page assembles your letter from your own fields, in this order: who you are and why you care, what you found, your ask, a reason they might hesitate and why it's still worth it, how to tell it happened, and a thank you. Here is an invented letter to an invented platform called Loopcast, built by the same code that builds yours:
Dear Loopcast team, I am a high school student in a class about how AI is used in the world. I want to be able to start fresh when a feed stops showing me things I care about. For a class project, I looked at my own feed and settings on Loopcast. This is what I found: - Of the first 20 items, 7 were recommendations from accounts I don't follow and 9 were from accounts I follow. - Of the 7 recommended items, 5 were about topics I already engage with a lot. - Of the 6 controls I looked for, I found 2 easily, 2 only after searching, and 2 not at all (a way to reset what the feed has learned and information for users under 18). I may have missed some. This is a small sample: 20 items, one day, one account. It may not match what other people see. My request: I am asking you to add a "Reset my recommendations" button to the settings page that clears what the feed has learned about me. One reason you might hesitate: Resetting could make the feed less accurate for a while, which might lower how long people stay. Why I think it is still worth doing: People would trust the feed more if they knew they could start over, and they might use the app more happily. A way to tell the change happened: The button would appear on the settings page and a person could tap it and see the feed change. Thank you for reading. I would welcome a reply. A high school student
Notice: every fact is a count from the writer's own audit, the sample is called small, the ask is one change, and nothing guesses at motives. The example has 7 evidence sentences to choose from, and the writer used 3.
A feed or its controls can work well for you and badly for someone else. Pick one group and write a question you would check: for example, "Can someone who uses a screen reader reach the 'not interested' option?" You can't answer it from your own feed, and you shouldn't say you have. You can ask it, and you can choose to include it in your letter.
Total: 0 of 20
Finish the audit in step 1 and your evidence sentences will appear here.
The letter builds itself from your fields. Change a field above and the letter changes. It always includes a plain statement that your sample is small.
Dear … team, I am a high school student in a class about how AI is used in the world. … For a class project, I looked at my own feed and settings on …. This is what I found: - … This is a small sample: 20 items, one day, one account. It may not match what other people see. My request: … One reason you might hesitate: … Why I think it is still worth doing: … A way to tell the change happened: … Thank you for reading. I would welcome a reply. A high school student
Swap letters with a partner. Your partner answers these about your letter. Then you reply. A good review points at a line in the letter, not at a feeling.
Choosing "may send" only gives your teacher permission to decide. The page sends nothing.
FEED AUDIT SHEET (counts only) Platform: … · my own account and device: not confirmed FIRST 20 ITEMS From accounts I follow: ? (?%) · recommended: ? (?%) · labeled ads: ? (?%) · couldn't tell: ? (?%) Different topics: ? CONTROLS I LOOKED FOR - A "why am I seeing this?" explanation on a post: ? - A way to say "not interested" or "show me less of this": ? - A way to reset or clear what the feed has learned about me: ? - A setting to limit personalized ads: ? - Ads that I could tell were ads without tapping them: ? - Anything in the settings or privacy summary about users under 18: ? Found easily 0 · after searching 0 · not found 0 · minutes spent: ? PRIVACY SUMMARY (not done yet) WHAT SURPRISED ME: … WHO IT MIGHT WORK WORSE FOR (a question to check, not a finding): …. … THE ASK Type: … Evidence I used: … Limits of my audit: …
| Part | Meets the project | Strong |
|---|---|---|
| Audit | A tally that adds up to 20, all six controls answered, and a privacy summary step with counts or a record of what you tried. | You recorded "couldn't tell" and "couldn't find" honestly instead of guessing, and you can say what a count shows and what it doesn't. |
| Evidence | At least two facts from your own audit, one that fits your ask. | Your facts are about what you saw. You used them to support the ask and nothing more. |
| Ask | One concrete change to a named feature, with a way to check it. | A stranger could test whether the company did it, in under a minute. |
| Fairness | A reason the company might hesitate, and why the change is still worth it. | Your reason is one the company would actually give. |
| Tone and safety | No personal details, no contact details, and no guessing at motives. | You'd be comfortable if the company read every word. |
| Review | Five peer answers, a comment on a line, and a reply. | You changed something because of the review, or you can say why you didn't. |
| Honesty | Limits are specific. | You claim nothing about the platform or other people, only about your feed, your day and your count. |
🛠 Project 3.1.3 · Unit 3 of 3 · 11 Weeks